Radical Anthropology<p>This paper using gene sequences to track linguistic 'capacity' is from a <a href="https://c.im/tags/Chomskyite" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Chomskyite</span></a> perspective (eg Tattersall among authors) pinning <a href="https://c.im/tags/language" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>language</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/evolution" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>evolution</span></a> to <a href="https://c.im/tags/genetic" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>genetic</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/mutation" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>mutation</span></a>!</p><p>But even chimps and bonobos have significant 'capacity' so the key question would be <a href="https://c.im/tags/social" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>social</span></a> conditions which liberate that capacity. </p><p>We know from the <a href="https://c.im/tags/ochre" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>ochre</span></a> record that <a href="https://c.im/tags/ritual" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>ritual</span></a> culture had become <a href="https://c.im/tags/PanAfrican" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>PanAfrican</span></a> by 140,000 years ago. This date needs to catch up! They have shell beads in Morocco already.</p><p><a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1503900/full" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">frontiersin.org/journals/psych</span><span class="invisible">ology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1503900/full</span></a></p>