c.im is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
C.IM is a general, mainly English-speaking Mastodon instance.

Server stats:

2.9K
active users

#lachlan

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

A Nevada commissioner ruled resoundingly against ’s attempt to change his family’s
-- to consolidate his eldest son ’s control of his media empire
-- and lock in Fox News’s right-wing editorial slant, according to a sealed court document obtained by The New York Times.

The commissioner, Edmund J. Gorman Jr., concluded in a decision filed on Saturday that the father and son, who is the head of Fox News and News Corp.,
had acted in “bad faith” in their effort to amend the irrevocable trust,
which divides control of the company equally among Mr. Murdoch’s four oldest children
— Lachlan, James, Elisabeth and Prudence
— after his death.

The ruling was at times scathing.

At one point in his 96-page opinion, Mr. Gorman characterizes the plan to change the trust as a
“carefully crafted charade”
to “permanently cement Lachlan Murdoch’s executive roles” inside the empire
“regardless of the impacts such control would have over the companies or the beneficiaries” of the family trust.

The battle over the family trust is not about money
— Mr. Murdoch is not seeking to diminish any of his children’s financial stakes in the company
— but rather about future control of the world’s most powerful conservative media empire,
which includes Fox News,
The Wall Street Journal,
The New York Post and major newspapers and television outlets in Australia and Britain.

James and Elisabeth are both known to have less-conservative political views than their father or brother.

If Mr. Murdoch fails to lock in Lachlan’s leadership of the company,
he will be unable to ensure that Fox News will remain a right-wing news outlet after his death,
putting in jeopardy the legacy of the conservative empire he had spent his life building.

In seeking to consolidate Lachlan’s control over this empire,
Mr. Murdoch has argued that maintaining the political bent of his outlets
— and stripping the voting power of three of his children
— is in the financial interest of all his beneficiaries.
nytimes.com/2024/12/09/busines

The battle over the Murdoch family trust will go a long way toward determining the future of the world’s most powerful conservative media empire.
The New York Times · Rupert Murdoch Fails in Bid to Change Family TrustBy Jonathan Mahler

(1/3)

Murdoch family drama plays out in court with fate of Fox News at stake

If , 93, prevails in his legal effort to change voting rights of the
to ensure that his chosen successor and conservative-leaning eldest son, Murdoch, 53, runs the company after his death, little may change.

♦️The proceedings pit Murdoch, 93, and his chosen successor, Lachlan, against his three more liberal-leaning siblings, Prudence, Elizabeth and James,
over future control of Murdoch’s Corp and Corp through the family’s control of the global empire’s share structure via an irrevocable trust set up in 1999.

According to the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal, Murdoch is arguing that
“shifting voting control of the trust to Lachlan should be allowed because it is in the best interest of all the beneficiaries, including his other children”.

⭐️But if the patriarch loses, the younger brother Murdoch, in concert with his sisters and , could force Fox News to move away from the conservative news alignments of their father and brother.

🧨That would be an earthquake in American politics.

➡️ No other media power in the US has the impact that Fox News has had in the last two decades.

It has become a driving force of American conservatism, feared for its power by both Republicans and Democrats.

And condemned by many for its conservative bias and numerous show hosts who have become darlings of the US right and powerful players on their own.

Figures such as Sean are hugely powerful within the Maga world, while the former host Tucker
– now exiled from the station where he rose to power
– has withered outside it and been largely unable to recreate the influence he had while broadcasting to Fox’s viewers.

Gaming out the different scenarios at stake in Reno is water cooler talk at Fox News’s midtown New York headquarters,
with TV hosts discussing a reposition of their own personal brands if liberal-leaning James wins
and opening back-channel communications with him if his father and rival brother prevail.

But despite their immense importance the legal arguments over the Murdoch Family Trust presented within the impenetrable walls of a 1960’s annex court extension in Reno last week are known only to the judge and court staff, Rupert Murdoch, his first and second set of children and an army of lawyers, including Trump’s attorney general William Barr.

“A family trust like the one at issue in this case … is essentially a private legal arrangement,”
the Washoe county probate commissioner Edmund J Gorman Jr, wrote in an 18-page recommendation before the parties convened.

❇️ James, Elisabeth and Prudence, want the trust to be maintained and oppose Murdoch’s proposed change giving Lachlan control because they would stand to lose voting power.

Yet while Lachlan’s politics are comfortably rightwing and match his father’s,
the opposing other siblings have a different world view.

James Murdoch even hosted Joe in his home for a fundraiser in 2022 and🔥 has endorsed to beat Trump in 2024.

But it won’t be Fox politics under discussion so much in Reno.
Instead, much of that argument will be couched in an examination of US corporate governance conventions that allow for a family to control a business they do not majority own by a so-called structure of shares
– in effect the family shares have more power than others.
theguardian.com/media/2024/sep

The Guardian · Murdoch family drama plays out in court with fate of Fox News at stakeBy Edward Helmore
Continued thread

In addition to running Sinclair,
David Smith has used his vast wealth to support a variety of far-right causes.

The Baltimore Banner reports that
👉 since 2015, Smith, through his family foundation,
has donated large sums to "Young Americans for Liberty" ($581,000),
"Project Veritas" ($536,000),
"Turning Point USA"
($150,000), and "Moms for Liberty" ($121,000).

Meanwhile, News Corp’s cable news properties, Fox News and Fox Business, also helped launder the Wall Street Journal’s attacks on Biden into the news cycle.

According to transcript searches, the WSJ piece’s core claim
that Biden is “slipping”
was brought up at least 64 times on air on Fox News and Fox Business from when the article was published until yesterday afternoon.

Online, the WSJ piece has been the focus of at least 15 articles on Fox News’ website,
with many of them treating its dubious claims about Biden’s decline as a demonstrated fact.

Continued thread

A 2018 study published in the American Political Science Review
found that
👉stations purchased by Sinclair
increase "coverage of national politics at the expense of local politics"
👉 and undergo "a significant rightward shift in the ideological slant of coverage."

🌟Delivering right-wing attacks on Biden's mental fitness under the guise of "local news" is an extremely powerful tactic. 🌟

While many Americans are distrustful of the national media,
71% believe that local news is accurate,
including 78% of Democrats and 66% of Republicans.

This is not the first time Sinclair has exploited Americans' trust in local news to boost Republicans politically.

In 2016, the Trump campaign provided Sinclair stations with extensive access to Trump in exchange for friendly coverage that did not include fact-checking.

🔥"We are here to deliver your message," Smith told Trump 🔥in a 2016 meeting.

In 2017, Sinclair hired , who previously served as a Trump advisor and surrogate, as its Chief Political Analyst.

👉Sinclair stations were 💥required 💥to run Epshteyn's political commentary.

"The American people demand change, and they demand action, and that’s exactly what they’ll get from this administration going forward," Epshteyn declared in one piece.

In 2018, 🔥anchors at Sinclair affiliates were forced to read a script warning viewers about "fake stories" being published by other media outlets "to push their own personal bias and agenda." 🔥

The argument mirrored then-president Donald Trump's criticism of the media.

Continued thread

The Wall Street Journal piece was panned by independent media critics.

CNN's Oliver Darcy said the Wall Street Journal piece had "glaring problems."

In Poynter, Tom Jones wrote that it was not a "fairly reported story" because it relied exclusively on "quotes and opinions from those who don’t want to see Biden elected to a second term."

Nevertheless, ⭐️the Wall Street Journal piece was repackaged by Sinclair Broadcast Group and beamed into the homes of millions of Americans. ⭐

, which is controlled by right-wing media mogul , owns or operates 185 local television stations across 86 markets.

Sinclair repackaged the Wall Street Journal story through its centralized news team, known as The National Desk.

The segment was then pushed to dozens of local news stations owned by Sinclair.

Local anchors introduced the piece by reading from a nearly identical script.

Again and again, the anchors say that the Wall Street Journal is "out with new reporting calling into question the mental fitness of President Joe Biden," adding that the issue "could be an election decider."

Two outlets controlled by right-wing media tycoons are working in tandem
to aggressively push specious claims about President Joe Biden's fitness for office. 

On June 4, the Wall Street Journal published a 3,000-word article questioning Biden's mental acuity.

The Wall Street Journal is owned by News Corp, the media conglomerate founded by right-wing billionaire .
. (News Corp is now chaired by Rupert Murdoch's son, .)

The Wall Street Journal article,
headlined “Behind Closed Doors, Biden Shows Signs of Sipping,” boasts that it is based on "interviews with more than 45 people over several months."

👉But only one person is quoted on the record supporting the thesis of the piece: Former House Speaker (R-CA).
“I used to meet with him when he was vice president. I’d go to his house,” McCarthy told the Wall Street Journal. “He’s not the same person.” 

🔥Relying on McCarthy as the lynchpin of the article is problematic. First, McCarthy is not a neutral observer. He is a partisan Republican interested in inflicting political damage on Biden.

Further, what McCarthy told the Wall Street Journal about Biden is directly contradicted by comments that McCarthy said previously
— both publicly and privately.

In the article, McCarthy criticizes Biden's performance in debt ceiling negotiations in 2023. But in March 2023, while these negotiations were underway, the New York Times reported that
"McCarthy has told allies that he has found Mr. Biden to be mentally sharp in meetings."

McCarthy made similar comments about Biden in public, praising Biden as "[v]ery professional, very smart" and "[v]ery tough at the same time."

In October, when McCarthy was ousted as House Speaker, Politico reported that McCarthy "mocked Biden’s age and mental acuity in public, while privately telling allies that he found the president sharp and substantive in their conversations."

publicnotice.co/p/sinclair-bid

Public Notice · Sinclair injects deceptive attacks on Biden's age into dozens of local broadcastsBy Aaron Rupar

Rupert Murdoch, the Australian press baron who reshaped conservative media in his image, plans to step down as chairman of . and .
He will become chairman emeritus of the two corporations, Fox Corp. announced in a news release. His older son, , will become the sole chairman of both the firms.

nbcnews.com/media/rupert-murdo

NBC NewsRupert Murdoch to step down as chairman of Fox Corp. and News Corp.By Daniel Arkin

anxiety: bombshell claims about and family

Two people close to Murdoch say he is biding his time until he and his sisters can wrest control from . Some think James would purge Fox News and transform it into a centre-right alternative to CNN; others think he would sell up to private equity, prompting a “visceral fear” inside the network about its future.

Whether Lachlan, a reputed fan of “the good life”, even wants the top job is another question – though several sources confirmed he did.

theguardian.com/media/2023/apr

The GuardianSuccession anxiety: bombshell claims about Rupert Murdoch and familyBy Rachel Hall