Let's Encrypt 把 CRL 位置加到憑證裡面了
在「Adding CRL URLs to certificates」這邊看到的公告，把 CRL 位置加到憑證裡面了： On March 12, 2025, Let’s Encrypt will start including CRL (Certificate Revocation List) URLs in certificates we issue, in addition to the OCSP URLs we already include. This is part of our previously announced changes to deprecate support for OCSP. CRLs and OCSP are two di…
Gea-Suan Lin's BLOG · Let's Encrypt 把 CRL 位置加到憑證裡面了在「Adding CRL URLs to certificates」這邊看到的公告，把 CRL 位置加到憑證裡面了： On March 12, 2025, Let’s Encrypt will start including CRL (Certificate Revocation List) URLs in certificates we issue, in addition to the OCSP URLs we already include.
![Text from article:
While this drama is spilling out in the press, it’s legally relevant. Multiple challenges to Musk and the actions of his Department of Government Efficiency allege his vast authority violates the Appointments Clause, one of the Constitutions key anti-corruption measures. Under this clause, which the framers crafted to prevent the kingly practice of handing jobs and authority to unaccountable allies, any officer of the United States must be formally nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Moreover, such appointees must fill a role created by Congress. Musk’s exercise of vast authority, at least four lawsuits allege, is unconstitutional, as he was neither confirmed by the Senate nor is he serving in any role Congress created. “You don’t have to stretch the text very far to see that there is a problem under [the Appointments Clause in] Article Two,” says Jed Shugerman, a law professor and historian at Boston University School of Law.](https://assets.newsie.social/media_attachments/files/114/186/560/211/863/334/original/3791a9e3abf0cc81.png "Text from article:
While this drama is spilling out in the press, it’s legally relevant. Multiple challenges to Musk and the actions of his Department of Government Efficiency allege his vast authority violates the Appointments Clause, one of the Constitutions key anti-corruption measures. Under this clause, which the framers crafted to prevent the kingly practice of handing jobs and authority to unaccountable allies, any officer of the United States must be formally nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Moreover, such appointees must fill a role created by Congress. Musk’s exercise of vast authority, at least four lawsuits allege, is unconstitutional, as he was neither confirmed by the Senate nor is he serving in any role Congress created. “You don’t have to stretch the text very far to see that there is a problem under [the Appointments Clause in] Article Two,” says Jed Shugerman, a law professor and historian at Boston University School of Law.")
