c.im is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
C.IM is a general, mainly English-speaking Mastodon instance.

Server stats:

2.9K
active users

#trumpimmunitydodge

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

MSNBC

Judge Luttig: The Supreme Court just handed a ‘very difficult decision’ to Jack Smith

Judge J. Michael Luttig joins Ali Velshi to discuss the practical implications of the Supreme Court agreeing to hear Donald Trump’s far-fetched immunity claim, a move that is likely to further delay the former president’s federal election interference case. Luttig breaks down the most realistic timeline for the ruling and its fallout, predicting early October as the most likely start date for Smith’s trial to begin. Luttig also explains why the case is “far, far more important for the country and Constitution” than the United States v. Nixon case and others before it.

msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ju

Judge Luttig has remarkable ability to speak in terms of complete paragraphs.

:

:::

www.msn.comMSN

TRUMP'S IMMUNITY DODGE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT

MSNBC

Lawrence: SCOTUS ‘threw out half of Trump’s appeal’ in immunity case

youtube.com/watch?v=EC6ZRvBP0t

This is a really different discussion from the others I have heard, especially Lawrence O'Donnell's introduction. Neil Katyal's comments are very focused. The bad news here is the same as the bad news we have heard elsewhere: - at least five Supreme Court justices have voted to delay delay delay. This video is very much worth watching.

:

:::

MSNBC

Laurence Tribe: The Supreme Court is suppressing evidence

youtube.com/watch?v=PvLxLFeNwZ

It doesn't get more important than this.

As Eric Holder said, Donald Trump's criminal trials, in addition to his civil trials, would provide important information for voters. The Supreme Court has just suppressed that information and engaged in clear, probably deliberate election interference.

:

:::

ELECTION INTERFERENCE 2024

The United States Supreme Court Scores Big, "Stepping Up" on Behalf of a Traitor to Our Nation.

"Cravenness" is a word MSNBC's Rachel Maddow used when speaking of this latest move by the Supreme Court

:

:::

MSNBC

‘It is unimaginable to me the former President will be tried before November’ says Judge Luttig

youtube.com/watch?v=hg6UxwFph_

Only the Pollyanna Wing of the Democratic Party will find anything to be happy about, coming out of this discussion.

I had trouble making out key passages in Nicolle Wallace's comments. It sounded as though she was making important points. It would have been nice to hear them.

:

:::

SUPREME COURT STEPS UP TO HELP DONALD TRUMP
DELAY DELAY DELAY

POLITICO

Supreme Court stalls Trump’s federal election trial while weighing his immunity bid

The justices will hear arguments in late April on whether Trump is immune from the charges. In the meantime, the case will remain frozen.

By Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney
02/28/2024 05:09 PM EST
Updated: 02/28/2024 06:03 PM EST

politico.com/news/2024/02/28/s

:

:::

TRUMP'S LIKELY APPEAL OF APPEALS COURT REJECTION OF CRIMINAL IMMUNITY CLAIM

MSNBC

Neal Katyal: This opinion shows the legal system working at its best

youtube.com/watch?v=lWwK3sME7p

The part here that interested me most was presented by Neil Katyal. He thinks the DC election interference case can go to court before the November election. What it seems to me viewers might find most interesting is why this is what he thinks. Katyal, better than anyone I have seen or heard, explains the extreme absurdity of Trump's extravagant (to put it mildly) criminal immunity claims.

:

:::

‘Former President Trump has become Citizen Trump’: Ari Melber reacts to immunity appeal ruling

youtube.com/watch?v=ZQxSRA0kOI

Ali Velshi with a panel of three

Excellent discussion of today's appeal court ruling that Donald Trump does not have criminal immunity.

Ari Melber, who is featured in the headline above, is my favorite MSNBC host. Check out his contribution here as a panel member and see what you think.

:

:::

Washington Post Via MSN

4 takeaways from Trump’s loss in his immunity case
Story by Aaron Blake • 2h

msn.com/en-us/news/politics/4-

The "takeaways" field has been in a slump lately. This Washington Post piece is not an example. Rather, it is a very good read and well worth your time. It is important to have in mind that Donald Trump was not asking for immunity. He was asking for CRIMINAL immunity.

It's my party
I'll be crooked if I want to.....

:

:::

www.msn.comMSN

BREAKING: Appeals court hits Trump with ruling he’s been dreading

Brian Tyler Cohen With Glenn Kirschner

youtube.com/watch?v=EbMTpE9LAn

This video answered several of my questions and it may answer some of yours.

At this point, it is easy to imagine Donald Trump singing the Artie Traum song,

All my prayers have been answered
And the answer is No

:

tyler cohen

:::

The Legal Breakdown

CRUCIAL update on Trump ruling we've been waiting for

Brian Tyler Cohen With Glenn Kirschner

youtube.com/watch?v=fmzwmuQc9M

Very worthwhile discussion of Donald Trump's criminal immunity claim and the process toward deciding the case.

This video has been posted for one hour. It has 150,000 views and 13,000+ Thumbs Up against zero Thumbs Down.

:

:::

PRESIDENTS MUST HAVE UNIVERSAL AND ETERNAL IMMUNITY, EVIDENTLY STARTING WITH 45

Trump SNAPS, makes most unhinged claim yet in public

Brian Tyler Cohen With Glenn Kirschner

youtube.com/watch?v=tVTtSR9UYx

If you haven't seen this video already, you would likely find it to be well worth your time. It was posted four hours ago and it already has well over a quarter of a million views and 19,000 thumbs up against zero thumbs down.

We need to check in with all living former presidents to see how many of them were prosecuted, after leaving office, by the opposing party.

:

:::

The Daily Beast quoted Donald Trump's recent immunity claim this way:

“EVEN EVENTS THAT ‘CROSS THE LINE’ MUST FALL UNDER TOTAL IMMUNITY, OR IT WILL BE YEARS OF TRAUMA TRYING TO DETERMINE GOOD FROM BAD,” he wrote. In 144 words of all-caps, Trump argued that it “WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM/HER TO PROPERLY FUNCTION” without full immunity for presidential actions. He claimed that any mistake would encounter “ALMOST CERTAIN INDICTMENT BY THE OPPOSING PARTY AT THE TERM END.”

Let's take a poll of all living former presidents to see whether the opposing party indicted them after they left office.

:

:::

MSNBC

Trump’s immunity claim would turn ‘Constitution into a suicide pact’, says Rep. Schiff

Jen Psaki interviewing Adam Schiff

youtube.com/watch?v=z3b5DkHoK1

Trump ought to think twice about arguing that a president in office can order the assassination of a political rival, with absolute criminal immunity, at a time when he, himself, is not in office. Trump had better hope Dark Brandon is not listening.

:

:::