c.im is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
C.IM is a general, mainly English-speaking Mastodon instance.

Server stats:

2.8K
active users

#majority

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

A quotation from Lincoln

A majority held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations, and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people. Whoever rejects it does of necessity fly to anarchy or to despotism.

Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) American lawyer, politician, US President (1861-65)
Speech (1861-03-04), Inaugural Address, Washington, D. C.

Sourcing, notes: wist.info/lincoln-abraham/2539…

#quote #quotes #quotation #anarchy, #authoritarianism #checksandbalances #Constitution #democracy #despotism #government #majority #mobrule #populargovernment #popularopinion #sovereignty #tyranny

In the of voters have favored preserving or increasing funding for the Department of .

Unfortunately for those voters, the people that agree with them did NOT win the last election, and federal gov primed and in a rush to destroy of along with any initiatives

As scapegoating and irate legislative attacks against in educational initiatives continues, silence = complicity.

While wage war of rooted rants , the constant and oft uninformed attacks against inclusion policies reveal a rabid retelling of false facts flagrantly spewed to spread bigotry, and destroy confidence in people of color's qualifications, while few say anything to oppose this narrative.

The blaming of the tragic plane crash over the brought on a new low, and few, if any, stood and denounced the words that spewed from the 's pulpit.

briefly.co/anchor/Higher_educa

There is only ONE WAY
To hope to 'curb' #Fascism in #America
>Only one<
(and it is not said that it is enough)

Give the #Majority in #Parliament / #Senate to #Democrats
if Democrats have a majority perhaps (maybe)
they will be able to limit the damage
(But at this point it's not sure they can)
If #Americans want to 'save the salvable'
It is the only opportunity that remains
Give the majority in Parliament and in the Senate to the Democrats
>as soon as possible<

probably is already too late

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗬𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝘆𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲-𝗼𝗿-𝗯𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗸 𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗨.𝗦. 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲.

T𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘦'𝘴 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘳𝘰𝘰𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘱 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘈𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘭𝘢 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵.

Because if Angela loses this race to Larry Hogan, Democrats can kiss the goodbye.

But polling is TIED, and we're running out of time to connect with voters.

We've gotta help Angela pull ahead, and that starts by hitting our critical $500,000 FEC End-of-Quarter goal before Monday's midnight deadline.

𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝘀, 𝗔𝗟𝗟 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝘂𝗽 𝘁𝗼 $𝟭𝟱𝟬,𝟬𝟬𝟬,

𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗔𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹𝗮 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆!

Can Angela count on you to chip in $25 (or whatever you can afford) and have it doubled today so we can win the race that will decide Senate control?

secure.actblue.com/donate/bs_s

- Team

ActBlueSupport Angela Alsobrooks & Hold Maryland!Will you chip in ASAP to become a General Election Founding Donor and hold Maryland's Senate seat blue?

A and trusted are foundational requirements for progress on any number of issues.

Donors who haven’t funded in this area, or see democracy issues as outside their interests, should
❇️ take a wider view of how to advance their values.

Donors who already support work on voting and elections should
❇️ consider ramping up their giving during this period of growing threats to U.S. democracy

⭐️Where to Donate for Voting Rights and Democracy

♦️♦️Organizations focused on protecting and strengthening electoral systems.

Donors must first and foremost invest in shoring up the democratic system in the short term.

This means supporting to
👉push back on unfounded claims of fraud as well as
👉challenging unfair election laws.

Funding for this strategy should also go to groups focused on
👉making voting easier and more accessible,
advocating for policies like
👉expanded early voting,
👉automatic and same day registration, and the
👉repeal of felony disenfranchisement laws.

On the legal side, donors can support the
🔹Brennan Center for Justice, brennancenter.org/
🔹NAACP Legal Defense Fund, naacpldf.org/
🔹Demos demos.org/
🔹and Campaign Legal Center campaignlegal.org/

All four groups engage in , and advocacy.

♦️♦️Organizing for a more expansive and inclusive democracy.

🆘 Low-income people, communities of color and young people participate in elections and civic life at lower levels than the general public.

✅ To create a more representative democracy and advance progressive change, donors should invest in organizations that work to engage these voters.

Groups like
🔹Community Change communitychange.org/
🔹and Center for Popular Democracy populardemocracy.org/

both work with and support groups and leaders throughout the country,
with a focus on of .

Donors can also support the
🔹Voter Participation Center and its c4 arm,
the 🔹Center for Voter Information, centerforvoterinformation.org/

which work to increase turnout among “ ” voters,

as well as support groups focused on ,
such as
🔹NextGen America nextgenamerica.org/
and
🔹TurnUp turnup.us/

♦️♦️Groups advocating for democratic reforms.

A range of reforms can help create a democracy that is more responsive,
offering voters more choices and fostering fairer outcomes as well as increased trust in our electoral system.

Donors can support
🔹FairVote, fairvote.org/

which advocates for voting and ,
and has already had some success at the state and local levels;
and
🔹Unite America, uniteamerica.org/
which focuses on , ,
as well as voting.

Brennan Center for JusticeBrennan Center for Justice | HomeDefend Democracy. Reform Justice. Protect the Constitution. The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law works to build an America that is democratic, just, and free.

Ranked choice is 'the hot reform' in democracy.

Five states have banned in the last two months,
bringing the total number of Republican-leaning states now prohibiting to 10.

Missouri could soon join them.
If approved by voters, a GOP-backed measure set for the state ballot this fall would amend Missouri’s constitution to ban ranked choice voting.

Ranked choice voting allows voters to rank candidates and ensures the winner gains support,
as compared to the vast majority of elections, where someone can win with a of votes.

“We believe in the one person, one vote system of elections that our country was founded upon,”
Missouri state Sen. Ben Brown, the ballot measure’s sponsor,
said in an interview.

In the 2022 election cycle, a group of Republicans and Democrats unsuccessfully sought to advance a ranked choice voting proposal in Missouri.

That would have instituted nonpartisan primariesfor statewide, congressional and state legislative elections.

The top four candidates would advance to the general election, where voters could then rank candidates from favorite to least favorite.

If someone gets a majority of initial votes, they win.

If no one gets a majority, the fourth place contender would be eliminated.

And voters who ranked that candidate first would have their vote go to their second choice.

🔹This process would continue until a candidate gets a majority.

🔸If Missourians approve the ranked choice voting ban, the state will join
Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Kentucky
in barring the voting system this year.

Alaska, where voters approved ranked choice voting in 2020, could see the practice repealed.

♦️Meanwhile in other states, including
Nevada and Oregon,
voters will decide whether to adopt ranked choice voting later this year.

npr.org/2024/06/05/nx-s1-49695

Theda Skocpol, a professor of political science and sociology at Harvard, contended that many of the developments in states controlled by Republicans are a result of careful, long-term by conservative strategists, particularly those in the , who are developing tools to build what she called “ ” within the context of a nominally democratic system of government.

Skocpol outlined her thinking in an email:

The first-movers who figured out how to configure this new “laboratory of democratic constriction” were legal eagles in the Federalist Society and beyond, because the key structural dynamic in the current G.O.P. gallop toward minority authoritarianism is the mutual interlock between post-2010 Republican control, often supermajority control, of dozens of and the in 2019 to allow even the most and bizarre forms of partisan .

These organized, richly resourced actors, she wrote,
"have figured out how to the current U.S. of and , given generational and geographic realities on the ground, and the in many ways fluky 2016 presidential election gave them what they needed to put the interlock in place. They are stoking and using the fears and resentments of about half or so of the G.O.P. popular base to and their own and . They are doing it because they can, and they believe in what they are doing. They are America’s G.O.P. Leninists.
Skocpol did not pull her punches:

This situation, locked in place by a and by many -borough like the one in , means that minority , behind a bare facade of “,” can render majority-elected officials, including the president and many governors, officials in name only. The great thing from the minority authoritarian point of view is that those visible chief executives (and urban mayors and district attorneys) can still be blamed for government nonfunction and societal problems, but they cannot address them with even broadly supported measures (such as simple background checks for having military assault weapons).

nytimes.com/2023/04/12/opinion

The New York TimesOpinion | The Republican Strategists Who Have Carefully Planned All of ThisBy Thomas B. Edsall

Call it an escape valve, an off-ramp or a break-glass-in-case-of-emergency option.

From Pennsylvania Avenue to Wall Street to Main Street, those anxious about the political over the federal are eying an arcane, seldom successful congressional process known as a as a possible solution to ward off a disastrous default.
The petition is just what its name implies: a signed demand, in this case bearing the of a of the , that can force consideration on the floor of a certain piece of legislation.
The demand would be an increase in the federal debt limit — a way of staving off disaster if House Republicans refuse to agree to raise it before the Treasury Department exhausts its legal authority to borrow to pay its creditors this summer.
But the process is exceedingly difficult, time-consuming and easily derailed. It has been successful only rarely in recent decades, most notably with passage of a campaign finance overhaul in 2002.
That high degree of difficulty — and the economic threat posed by a federal default — has some urging their colleagues in the House to, at minimum, .
They see it as a safeguard in the event that dormant debt talks between President Biden and Speaker Kevin McCarthy deteriorate further and the country finds itself on the brink of economic peril with no end in sight this year.
nytimes.com/2023/04/07/us/poli

The New York TimesCan Congress Use an Archaic Process to Get Around the Debt Stalemate?By Carl Hulse

Wisconsin Supreme Court election: Judge Janet Protasiewicz wins 👈👍👏

Judge Janet on Tuesday was to 's , giving the key swing state's highest court a that could potentially expand abortion rights there, AP reports.

The big picture: The seven-member Wisconsin Supreme Court has had a conservative majority since 2008. It's poised to decide in the next few years the constitutionality of a 19th century that was cited to restrict access to the procedure in the state since the fall of Roe v. Wade.

Protasiewicz will serve a #10- , succeeding conservative Justice Patience Roggensack, whose term expires in July 2023.
axios.com/2023/04/05/wisconsin

AxiosWisconsin Supreme Court flips to liberal majority in race spotlighting abortionBy Oriana González