c.im is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
C.IM is a general, mainly English-speaking Mastodon instance.

Server stats:

2.9K
active users

#NeuroSymbolicAI

1 post1 participant0 posts today

Our 3rd keynoter will be Enrico Motta from the Knowledge Media Institute of UK’s Open University. He pioneered with hybrid computational architectures integrating #ML with knowledge representation, being applied in application domains as e.g. news & scholarly analytics, and cognitive robotics.

Apply here: 2025.semanticwebschool.org/
Deadline: March 15, 2025

#knowledgegraph #AI #llm #generativeAI #responsibleAI @lysander07 @fiz_karlsruhe #semanticweb #lod #semanticweb #neurosymbolicai #robotics

TGDK is launching a Special Issue for Use-Case articles. They are interested in submissions describing use-cases (applications, events, products, services, etc.) that put research on Graph Data & Knowledge into practice. If you work on such initiatives, consider telling the community about them by submitting to the Special Issue!
Deadline is March 31, 2025.

drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/jou

@tgdkjournal #knowledgegraphs #semanticweb #ontologies #AI #neurosymbolicAI

drops.dagstuhl.deTGDK

Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A systematic review. ~ Brandon C. Colelough, William Regli. arxiv.org/abs/2501.05435 #AI #NeuroSymbolicAI

arXiv logo
arXiv.orgNeuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic ReviewBackground: The field of Artificial Intelligence has undergone cyclical periods of growth and decline, known as AI summers and winters. Currently, we are in the third AI summer, characterized by significant advancements and commercialization, particularly in the integration of Symbolic AI and Sub-Symbolic AI, leading to the emergence of Neuro-Symbolic AI. Methods: The review followed the PRISMA methodology, utilizing databases such as IEEE Explore, Google Scholar, arXiv, ACM, and SpringerLink. The inclusion criteria targeted peer-reviewed papers published between 2020 and 2024. Papers were screened for relevance to Neuro-Symbolic AI, with further inclusion based on the availability of associated codebases to ensure reproducibility. Results: From an initial pool of 1,428 papers, 167 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in detail. The majority of research efforts are concentrated in the areas of learning and inference (63%), logic and reasoning (35%), and knowledge representation (44%). Explainability and trustworthiness are less represented (28%), with Meta-Cognition being the least explored area (5%). The review identifies significant interdisciplinary opportunities, particularly in integrating explainability and trustworthiness with other research areas. Conclusion: Neuro-Symbolic AI research has seen rapid growth since 2020, with concentrated efforts in learning and inference. Significant gaps remain in explainability, trustworthiness, and Meta-Cognition. Addressing these gaps through interdisciplinary research will be crucial for advancing the field towards more intelligent, reliable, and context-aware AI systems.